EVE Search - New Dev Blog: Those anomaly changes in full

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: Those anomaly changes in full

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.25 22:35:00 - [1] This is how it should have been since the sov upgrades were introduced. If you aren't happy that your space is now crap then fight for better space or stfu and go back to empire.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.27 06:21:00 - [2] Good change imo. There should be changes to true sec distribution as it is atm though. Much much less in regions with high number of tech moons, much much more in regions without. PS: Loving the NC tears in this thread.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.27 08:16:00 - [3] Worthless pets incapable of pvping whining about not being able to make as much isk per hour as skilled established pvp alliances (or blobbers). Maybe CCP should hand out 1st prize to all alliance tournament participants just so everything is fair and there are no losers.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.27 21:52:00 - [4] Why should worthless pets such as FCON, DH etc make just as much isk as high tier alliances? Being able to belt rat, plex in your system and do a few average anomalies is fine and how it should be (and how it was). If their members need more isk then they should be sharing their moon goo profits amongst their membership instead of hoarding it for the IC to buy personal super caps.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.27 21:56:00 - [5] Originally by: Super Whopper Edited by: Super Whopper on 27/03/2011 15:26:58 Edited by: Super Whopper on 27/03/2011 15:25:40 Originally by: Kalle Demos Guys you are missing the point, sanctums were a risk free way for players to fund themselves to fight for their masters, while masters kept all the ISK and let it flow with moon goo. From SHC, where people do know what they're talking about. Doesn't count NPC sov systems in each region A: 0.0 to -0.2 (no sanctums/havens!) B: -0.3 to -0.4 (probably havens but few or no sanctums) C: -0.5 to -0.6 (slightly worse than now) D: -0.7 to -0.8 (slightly better than now) E: -0.9 to -1.0 (much better than now) Code: \| Region \| A \| B \| C \| D \| E \| \| \|----------------------+----+----+----+----+----+-----------\| \| The Spire \| 3 \| 9 \| 28 \| 18 \| 14 \| DRF (d) \| \| Cobalt Edge \| 7 \| 19 \| 19 \| 10 \| 14 \| DRF (d) \| \| Malpais \| 8 \| 22 \| 27 \| 34 \| 11 \| DRF (d) \| \| Perrigen Falls \| 4 \| 9 \| 39 \| 42 \| 10 \| DRF (d) \| \| Etherium Reach \| 6 \| 13 \| 37 \| 34 \| 10 \| DRF (d) \| \| The Kalevala Expanse \| 6 \| 16 \| 19 \| 17 \| 10 \| DRF (d) \| \| Outer Passage \| 12 \| 22 \| 15 \| 28 \| 8 \| DRF (d) \| \| Oasa \| 12 \| 16 \| 24 \| 24 \| 8 \| DRF (d) \| \| Delve \| 16 \| 10 \| 20 \| 16 \| 8 \| PL(for sale)\| \| Tenal \| 27 \| 17 \| 9 \| 7 \| 8 \| NC \| \| Feythabolis \| 29 \| 28 \| 18 \| 6 \| 8 \| CAAASEROL \| \| Branch \| 17 \| 25 \| 25 \| 20 \| 7 \| NC \| \| Period Basis \| 9 \| 11 \| 6 \| 3 \| 7 \| ? \| \| Cache \| 17 \| 11 \| 6 \| 1 \| 7 \| DRF \| \| Deklein \| 7 \| 6 \| 22 \| 27 \| 6 \| NC/DC \| \| Fountain \| 43 \| 21 \| 14 \| 8 \| 6 \| NC/DC \| \| Querious \| 31 \| 15 \| 11 \| 12 \| 5 \| ? \| \| Insmother \| 37 \| 27 \| 30 \| 10 \| 4 \| DRF \| \| Omist \| 12 \| 18 \| 6 \| 3 \| 4 \| DRF \| \| Vale of the Silent \| 48 \| 46 \| 10 \| 11 \| 3 \| NC \| \| Catch \| 59 \| 15 \| 15 \| 8 \| 3 \| CAAASEROL \| \| Esoteria \| 30 \| 20 \| 15 \| 6 \| 3 \| CAAASEROL \| \| Paragon Soul \| 20 \| 6 \| 2 \| 1 \| 3 \| CAAASEROL \| \| Tenerifis \| 29 \| 28 \| 12 \| 10 \| 2 \| CAAASEROL \| \| Detorid \| 26 \| 39 \| 23 \| 6 \| 2 \| DRF \| \| Scalding Pass \| 30 \| 15 \| 10 \| 6 \| 2 \| DRF \| \| Geminate \| 26 \| 28 \| 13 \| 3 \| 2 \| NC \| \| Immensea \| 20 \| 29 \| 26 \| 9 \| 0 \| DRF \| \| Wicked Creek \| 22 \| 38 \| 15 \| 7 \| 0 \| DRF \| \| Tribute \| 27 \| 14 \| 6 \| 7 \| 0 \| NC \| \| Impass \| 21 \| 19 \| 7 \| 3 \| 0 \| CAAASEROL \| \| Cloud Ring \| 8 \| 2 \| 0 \| 1 \| 0 \| NC/DC \| \| Fade \| 2 \| 20 \| 5 \| 0 \| 0 \| NC \| \| Providence \| 68 \| 12 \| 0 \| 0 \| 0 \| Ev0ke \| \| Pure Blind \| 58 \| 5 \| 0 \| 0 \| 0 \| NC/DC \| As you see, you haven't got the slightest clue what you're talking about. You see all those area's with all those horrible systems? They're going to be empty. Well done CCP, you're going to depopulate 0.0 Here's the link but easier to read. They weren't empty pre-Dominion, they won't be if this change goes through.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.28 06:39:00 - [6] "wah wah I'm going back to high sec to do lvl4" Why not WH/low incursions? Or low sec lvl4/5, 0.0 missions? Same reason you spend only a very small portion of the large amount of isk you generate atm through sanctum farming on pvp.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.28 07:17:00 - [7] Good example of how small alliance should go is Convicted. Move to npc space. Take over moons from weaker opponents. Take over good isk generating location possible (old goon pocket in syndicate). Build up membership and numbers before trying to get into a bigger 0.0 alliance or continue doing your own thing. Unfortunately they ended up in NC but there are many others who have done it and still doing it. Not carebears though. They'll just whine on the forums wanting all the benefits of 0.0 while avoiding conflict and even demanding CCP make things in their favor.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.28 14:36:00 - [8] Originally by: Edgar Druin Originally by: CCP Zymurgist CCP Greyscale is excited about the changes coming to anomalies ... Then Greyscale is an idiot. Our small alliance holds upgraded space that will no longer produce the anomalies that we're the reason we upgraded. I assume you'll refund us the cost of that upgrade. :sarcasm: The space we hold can no longer support the (small) number of people trying to use it, which means we can't earn enough to pvp, which means we go back to empire to mission ... no interest in that ... http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=372359&view=recent look at all that pvping
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.28 20:01:00 - [9] Edited by: Widemouth Deepthroat on 28/03/2011 20:01:05 Next up; jump bridge nerfs. NC bend over and take it!!!!
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.28 22:22:00 - [10] Originally by: Terianna Eri Originally by: VIncent Vance im a clueless idiot / so desperate for attention i'll troll a 99.5% unanimous thread fyp d-team alliance gets d-team space...deal with it
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.28 22:30:00 - [11] They don't do refunds for that kind of thing. Your corp/alliance has already reaped the benefits of the ihub and upgrades.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.29 02:49:00 - [12] Originally by: Lord Zoran You cant implement something and then just do a complete turn around and remove it. If you had considered the implications properly prior to introducing sanctums etc then it wouldnt have mattered but now 2 years later you realise the error and want to take it away the same way as in a further 2 years down the line you will realise how this was the final straw and caused the decline of your game while you turn off the last server. It have been just over 1 year. As CCP Greyscale said they've given things time to settle down and find their new equilibrium; now unhappy with the results they are shaking things up. Adapt or die.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.29 04:06:00 - [13] Originally by: Commander Hold If this goes through Im pulling my accounts. This is to much and ccp you have finally gone to far, your killing the game. It isn't killing the game, it is (hopefully) killing your carebear playstyle.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.29 05:00:00 - [14] anyone who disagrees with the carebears/NC is a troll, grub, child molester etc.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.29 05:12:00 - [15] The only ones leaving 0.0 will be carebears who didn't and couldn't fight for their space anyway. They belong in high sec (although they still have access to "end game" content if they want it).
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.29 07:31:00 - [16] That isn't an isk sink since only minerals and whatever ships etc are destroyed.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.29 08:50:00 - [17] You are giving solutions to different problems than the ones Greyscale is trying to solve.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.30 01:26:00 - [18] SMA being evicted from Pure Blind :D Who is next? :D :D :D
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.30 04:33:00 - [19] Originally by: orphenshadow Oh well ccp obviously spends too much time playing wow. maybe you should join them the way your carrying on about your carebearing getting nerfed. Can play on a non-pvp server and farm all you want without competition from other players.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.30 21:46:00 - [20] Originally by: Xel Ra Has anyone actually posted more on this issue than Liang? yep...whiny carebears.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.03.30 23:07:00 - [21] Originally by: Akuma Gouki Poor pilots = boring fleet compositions and less likelyhood of them actually participating in fleets instead of whoring up the belts. hahaha you guys drakes and t1 fit maelstroms. You don't need sanctums for that.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.04.01 03:38:00 - [22] Edited by: Widemouth Deepthroat on 01/04/2011 03:38:26 derp could be worng
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.04.03 06:02:00 - [23] LAWN has failed to get access to better ratting space after tense negotiations with NC leadership. Please do the right thing and turn over sov to NC. on your way back to empire.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.04.06 16:25:00 - [24] Originally by: Verity Auger ts with their mains. That's all I have to say about that. So what has out of alliance character botting got to do with PL? Just like I think it was SCOOTER1 saying on the comms recording I heard recently, it isn't our job to police bots...however at least in PL you get caught your going to get popped without hesitation. Better than majority of alliances in Eve I can say.
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.04.17 17:55:00 - [25] Originally by: nMeh anomalies are fine. now remove local and jump bridges. i can't wait :D
Widemouth Deepthroat	Posted - 2011.05.06 00:19:00 - [26] Originally by: Ryan Starwing Highend player is anyone who can at least fly a bc competantly, and for an example a drake with 1 or 2 months worth of sp total. So if you can fly a bc and been playing a month+ you are a highend player. ah no...doing 200dps in a drake with your meta 1 launchers and t1 hobygoblins is not high end (except maybe in TEST). High end is t2 fit battleship. If you let noobs come and hog your pve content with their poop ships taking 3 hours to complete a haven then that is your fault.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.